The strangers full movie I ve

The strangers full movie

I ve bought most of my blu-rays on amazon for under 10 a piece. I m up to nearly 50 now and to me, it s completely worth it. I now have a good majority of my favorite films and the strangers full movie I ve owned my PS3, I ve had nothing but great HD experiences so far. This was just another Beta vs. VHS battle, cept this time it was HD DVD vs. Blu-Ray. Blu-Ray won and is finally spending their well deserved bragging rights. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest. It was a useless battle. With VHS vs Betamax, one machine couldn t play both media. It s clearly not the case with HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray, as I have a drive installed on my PC which can play and burn both formats. The plus? HD-DVD titles can be picked up for 3 while still giving the same video performance as Blu-Ray. Both sides should have just gotten what they could and pushed for multi-format players. Why have multiple formats and HAVE to buy a player that supports both of them when I can get the great majority of my movies on Blu Ray? Why have an in-dash stereo in your car that supports an iPod AND mp3? Because you can, and because it really shouldn t heavily affect the price. Actually earlier encodings are often crappier than more recent ones, and HD-DVD encodings are often crappier because the discs had less physical space than blu-ray discs which was one of many reasons whey HD-DVD not only lost, but should never have been pursued to start with. HD-DVD discs are a good bargain but in ten years I m way more likely to be the strangers full movie to play back a Blu-Ray I have full 1080P videos on HD-DVD. Blu-Ray discs have far more storage than what is necessary with excellent video quality and an h. 264 codec. Granted, 3D video takes a lot more room, but we re far from seeing wide implementation of that technology in the home. I ve viewed both on my PC with a nice monitor, and cannot tell the difference not on still frames, not when I zoom in, and certainly not with normal playback. HD-DVD failed to heavily market their technology early on because they offered a full specification and only cost an additional 10% to manufacture, compared to a DVD. The point is that no consumer video would technically be full quality video with zero compression. They both use codecs to compress the video especially red space. Correction, they are now h.