Her minor thing christian kane

Her minor thing christian kane

Until the Hard Drive crashes and you lose them all at once. Yeah, my wife has one and it uses a tray loading drive. It is on the right hand side. You hit eject and the tray pops out. I havent looked lately at the new MB but I think it is still the same. Oops, my mistake! I see that the new one does have a slot loading drive. On hers the the lower portion of the back of the laptop pops out with a tray. I didnt realize that these were changed. Regardless it still doesnt mean that Apple will have to stick with a slot loading drive. The new one? All MacBooks have had a slot-loading drive. They were never changed. This is why I angry with posters on MacRumurs, as opposed to AI, the average age and/or IQ has got to be much, much lower because even the simplest of Google searches seems to be beyond many posters here. Apple transitioned tray-loadng optical drives out of all but the worlstation almost a decade a go and no Intel Mac has had a tray-loading drive, except for the Mac Pro workstation. Youre right, it doesnt mean Apple has to stick with slot-loading drive, but I pointed out incidents where Apple was willing to sacrifice functionality to maintain thinness and noted that they are obsessed with making their hardware thinner. What rationale do you have that a seldom used optical drive would warrant an excessive thickening of the Mac notebook chassis with a a clunky, un-seamless drive that is too expensive for most users, that takes up more space than any other component in the notebook, and holds very little information and is considerably slow compared to HDD and flash storage mediums? PS: Apple will be phasing be the optical drive out. On the consumer side, the technology is dying. Installing applications and OSes via optical disc is no longer the best method. People dont use their optical drives much as it is and using a Blu-ray reader on a note book to watch a movie with only the battery is foolish, at best. Either Apple will move the optical drive outside of portable Macs with the upcoming case revision or the one after that. That doesnt mean that Blu-ray still cant be supported or be an option when that happened, it just means it wont be an internal solution. Until the Hard Drive crashes and you lose them all at once. Hopefully its backed up. I have automatic cloud computng that backs up all my basic notes and contacts and emails of course and documents. I travel with a 250GB 5 HDD that is powered via FW. Its simple and effective. Its also cheaper than 5 50Gb Blu-ray discs and smaller, too, when you consider their cases. The new one? All MacBooks have had a slot-loading drive. They were never changed. This is why I angry with posters on MacRumurs, as opposed to AI, the average age and/or IQ has got to be much, much lower because even the simplest of Google searches seems to be beyond many posters here. Apple transitioned tray-loadng optical drives out of all but the worlstation almost a decade a go and no Intel Mac has had a tray-loading drive, except for the Mac Pro workstation. Youre right, it doesnt mean Apple has to stick with slot-loading drive, but I pointed out incidents where Apple was willing to sacrifice functionality to maintain thinness and noted that they are obsessed with making their hardware thinner. What rationale do you have that a seldom used her minor thing christian kane drive would warrant an excessive thickening of the Mac notebook chassis with a a clunky, un-seamless drive that is too expensive for most users, that takes up more space than any other component in the notebook, and holds very little information and is considerably slow compared to HDD and flash storage mediums? PS: Apple will be phasing be the optical drive out. On the consumer side, the technology is dying. Installing applications and OSes via optical disc is no longer the best method. People dont use their optical drives her minor thing christian kane as it is and using a Blu-ray reader on a note book to watch a movie with only the her minor thing christian kane is foolish, at best.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment